Home Proceedings Program News Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 3, 2025
Pages: 1243 - 1253
Research paper
Civil Engineering Editor: Andrija Zorić
See full issue
Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 21
PDF Downloads: 16
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Published: 11.09.2025. Research paper Civil Engineering Editor: Andrija Zorić

DIMENSIONING OF STRUTS FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE DIAPHRAGM WALLS TO SECURE EXCAVATION OF ADJACENT STRUCTURES

By
Radovan Perić ,
Radovan Perić
Contact Radovan Perić

Faculty of Civil Enginering and Architecture, University of Niš Serbia

Srđan Živković ,
Srđan Živković

Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Niš , Niš , Serbia

Dragana Turnić ,
Dragana Turnić

Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Niš , Niš , Serbia

Marija Spasojević Šurdilović
Marija Spasojević Šurdilović

Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Niš , Niš , Serbia

Abstract

Modern architectural solutions in densely populated areas require structures with multiple underground levels. With advancements in construction technology, numerous solutions have been developed to secure the excavation of foundation pits and adjacent structures. The most rational solution adopted is the securing of the excavation and adjacent structures with reinforced concrete diaphragm walls supported by steel struts at two levels. The paper outlines the specifics of the structural solution, with a detailed analysis of the steel struts. Special emphasis is placed on the stability control of the struts, which was conducted using various methods outlined in Eurocode 3. The control of flexural buckling was performed through the application of the equivalent column method, the use of equivalent geometric imperfections, and the implementation of both geometrically and materially nonlinear analysis with imperfections.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.