Home Proceedings Program News Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 3, 2025
Pages: 1113 - 1120
Review paper
Architecture Editor: Vuk Milošević
See full issue
Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 24
PDF Downloads: 14
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Published: 11.09.2025. Review paper Architecture Editor: Vuk Milošević

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE INTEGRATING CONCEPTS IN SPATIAL PLANNING: INSIGHTS FROM BULGARIA

By
Diana Ivanova Orcid logo
Diana Ivanova
Contact Diana Ivanova

Urban planning, Architecture, University of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy , Sofia , Bulgaria

Abstract

Based on the theoretical and practical spatial planning experience this paper aims to draw the attention of the professional spatial planning community and legislative authorities to the importance of legal regulation of an integrating strategic, program and planning document - a concept to ensure the integrated development and implementation of strategic and planning documents at municipal level.

The research is built on the spatial planning practice in Bulgaria, but it uses a holistic approach and lays on well-established principles in the field. Thus the basic elaborated statements could be applicable to spatial planning in general because they outline a possible algorithm for integrated decisions which contribute to the balanced and harmonious planning, management and functional-spatial development of the territories.

Some of the main findings of the study are the notions formed about the links and interactions between the different types of legally regulated strategic, planning and programming documents; the place and role of the necessary integrating concept for functional and spatial development and the possible structure and content of such kind of document.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.