Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia
Circulation within urban spaces refers to how people move through environments, and it plays a vital role in the design of pedestrian-friendly areas. The concept of circulation in architecture and urbanism is frequently equated with communication, as it enables the easy movement and connection between various elements of the urban landscape. Understanding how spaces function as integrated units allows for better design solutions that enhance both movement and comfort. In this context, spatial integration is crucial in determining how well different parts of a space function as a cohesive whole. When spaces are well integrated, they promote smooth interaction between different areas, facilitating walkability and contributing to a more connected urban landscape.
However, the challenge lies in effectively assessing the integration of urban space, particularly in areas shaped by temporary structures or urban furniture during public events.
Here it is shown that calculating the convex hull of the surface area of the space provides a reliable method for quantifying spatial integration, which directly impacts pedestrian circulation.
The study used the Convex Hull tool in Grasshopper software to analyze key public spaces. By comparing the surface area of the original geometry to the convex hull, an integration index was calculated, with values ranging from 0 to 1. High integration was observed when fewer fragmented spaces existed, facilitating smoother pedestrian movement.
These findings provide a quantitative approach to optimizing public spaces, leading to improved user experience by minimizing fragmentation and promoting spatial cohesion. This method offers immediate opportunities for architects and urban planners to design more efficient, user-friendly spaces.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
