Home Program
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 2, 2025
Pages: 695 - 705
Review paper
Civil Engineering Editor: Andrija Zorić
See full issue
Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 997
PDF Downloads: 3078
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Published: 11.09.2025. Review paper Civil Engineering Editor: Andrija Zorić

Biomass ash in alkali-activated materials technology - a scoping review

By
Olivera Bedov Orcid logo ,
Olivera Bedov
Contact Olivera Bedov

Department of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia

Suzana Draganić Orcid logo ,
Suzana Draganić

Department of Civil Engineering and Geodesy, Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad , Novi Sad , Serbia

Marijana Serdar Orcid logo
Marijana Serdar

Department of Materials, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Zagreb , Zagreb , Croatia

Abstract

As the construction industry moves toward decarbonization, there is a growing focus on developing alternative binders with a lower carbon footprint to replace Portland cement. Alkali-activated materials (AAMs) have emerged as one of the promising solutions because of the lower CO₂ emissions from their production and comparable performance. The main components of AAMs are amorphous aluminosilicate-rich precursors that react with alkali activators to form a solid binding matrix. Raw materials generally used as precursors in AAMs are industrial by-products such as slag, coal combustion fly ash, or metakaolin. The most commonly used activators to reach the desired performance of the binder are alkali hydroxides and alkali silicates. However, conventional alkali activators are chemicals characterized by a negative environmental impact and high cost, which limits the wide-scale application of AAMs in the construction sector. Replacing conventional chemical activators with alternative ones derived from waste materials is a promising solution to enhance the sustainability of AAMs while promoting their broader application. This paper presents a targeted scoping review on the use of different biomass ashes instead of chemical activators in the AAMs technology. The results showed that different biomass ashes can be used not only as a source of alkalis and silicates but also as a partial replacement for commonly used precursors.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read
See all >
Citations
Crossref Logo

3

Crossref Logo

Saman Ghobadian, Giulia Ischia, Osvaldo Romero Romero, Giacomo Rossi, Thomas Hoffmann, Matthias Kraume, Nader Marzban

(2026)

Hydrothermal humification and fulvification of grass for artificial humic substance production and by-product applications

Environmental Technology & Innovation, 41()

10.1016/j.eti.2026.104836

Crossref Logo

Shoukai Chen, Yutong Tian, Jialin Chen, Hang Wang, Qingfeng Hu

(2026)

Synergistic Effects and Mechanisms of Plant Ash and Activator on Geopolymer Gel Formation, Hydration Evolution and Mechanical Properties

Gels, 12(2)

10.3390/gels12020186

Crossref Logo

Mahtab Akbarzadeh Khoei, Julson Tchio, Labeed Ahmad, Juho Antti Sirviö, Juho Yliniemi

(2026)

Phlogopite Mica Under Acidic and Alkaline Conditions: Reactivity and Silicate Gel Formation

Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 109(6)

10.1111/jace.70910